Project research

Research Projects

Originality in the structure and content of the manuscript is required, adhering to the author guidelines. Present unpublished results or a novel perspective on an existing research topic.

Title: It should be brief and descriptive. Additionally, a short title of no more than 50 characters is recommended for page headers.

Author(s): Indicate the first and last name(s) and affiliation of each author. Also, provide the email address of the corresponding author or the person responsible for communications with the [institution/organization].

Abstract (two or three different languages: Spanish, English, and Portuguese): It should contain a maximum of 250 words, indicating the main results, findings, or discoveries presented in the manuscript. Avoid the use of abbreviations, bibliographic citations, and figures.

Keywords in two or three languages ​​(Spanish, English, and Portuguese): Add 5 to 7 relevant terms that highlight the main topics covered in the article and facilitate its search and retrieval in databases or search engines.

Written report of 20 to 30 pages

Cover Page
Report Title
Name of Evaluator or Evaluation Team
Responsible Institution
Date
Executive Summary
Project Overview
Main Objectives
Evaluation Methodology Used
Main Conclusions
Introduction
Justification for the Evaluation
Scope and Purpose
Project Context (institutional, geographical, temporal)
Description of the Evaluated Project
Original Project Objectives
Planned Activities
Available Resources
Duration and Schedule
Evaluation Methodology
Type of Evaluation (formative, summative, internal, external)
Techniques Used (interviews, surveys, document review, observation)
Success Criteria and Indicators
Sources of Information
Results Analysis
Comparison between objectives and results obtained
Schedule adherence and resource utilization
Effectiveness of activities carried out
Impact on beneficiaries or users
Strengths and Areas for Improvement
Aspects What worked well
Problems encountered
Recommendations for future phases or similar projects
Conclusions
Overall project assessment
Relevance of the results
Lessons learned
Recommendations
Specific suggestions for improvement or continuation
Proposals for future follow-up or evaluation
Appendices (optional)
Instruments used
Graphs, tables, or supplementary data
Relevant documentation