Specification of an electronic entrepreneurship model
Keywords:
digital gap, internet, entrepreneurship, innovation, developmentAbstract
The digital entrepreneurship involves the emergence of empathy, commitment, innovation and satisfaction to make a program to build a global digital village process. In this scenario, state deregulation looming citizen participation through electronic devices in order to generate ideas for Human Development. But in either scenario, as digital exclu-sion or inclusion, differences between resources and groups exacerbate asymmetries between individuals. This paper argues that in both contexts, digital gap or digital village, the entrepreneurship generates human development, but also intensifies the helplessness of people exposed to harassment. A review of theoretical and conceptual frameworks and findings reported in the state of knowledge warns that entrepreneurship is generated by perceptions of opportunity, that linked to expectations associated with compatibility, usability, and users, develop asymmetric relations between ciber-users. Therefore, we propose a model for study of these phenomena, in order to open the discussion about relevance of electronic devices in the dissemination of equity.
Downloads
References
ease of use, perceived information quality, and intention the use egovernment”. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 1, 30-44
Bakabulindi, F. (2012). “Does use of ICT relate with the way it is perceived? Evidence from mekerere universi-ty”. International Journal of Computing and ICT Re-search, 6, 75-94
Ballester, R., Gil, M., Gómez, S. y Gil, B. (2010). “Propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento de evalua-ción de la adicción al cibersexo”. Psicothema. 22, 1048-1063
Bizer, G., Larsen, J. y Petty, R. (2010). “Exploring the valence framing effect: negative framing enhances atti-tude strength”. Political psychology. 32, 59-80
Buelga, S. y Pons, J. (2012). “Agresiones entre adolescen-tes a través del teléfono móvil e Internet”. Psychological Intervention, 21, 91-101
Campbell, E. y Smalling, S. (2013). “American Indians and Bullying in school”. Journal of Indigenous Social Development, 2, 1-15
Campillo, C. (2012). “La gestión estratégica de la informa-ción municipal. Análisis de temas, su tratamiento e irrup-ción en el ayuntamiento del Elche (1995-2007)”. Revista de Estrategia, tendencia e Innovación de la Comunica-ción. 3, 149170
Cardon, M., Gregoire, D., Stevens, C. y Patel, P. (2013). “Measuring entrepreneurial passion: conceptual founda-tions and scale validation”. Journal of Business Ventur-ing, 28, 373-396
Chuo, Y-H., Tsai, C-H., Lan, Y-L. y Tsai, C-S. (2011).“The effect of organizational support, self efficacy and computer anxiety on the usage intention of e–learning system in hospital”. African Journal of Business Manage-ment, 5, 5518-5523
Danes, S. y Juyoung, J. (2013). “Copreneural identity de-velopment during new venture creation”. Journal of Fami-ly Business Management, 3, 45-61
Di Russo, D. y Douglas, M. (2013). “The validity of the technology acceptance model in colaboration system soft-ware”. Business and Management Reviews, 1-5
Díaz, C., Hernández, R. y Roldán, J. (2012). “A structural model of the antecedents to entrepreneurial capacity”. International Small Business Journal, 30, 850-872
Elizalde, A. (2010). “Estudio descriptivo de las estrategias de afrontamiento del Bullying, en profesorado mexicano”. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 353-372
Fenoll, V. (2011). “Usuarios activos y pasivos. La interacti-vidad de la audiencia en los medios digitales”. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 51, 1-26
Flores, L. y Mendieta, A. (2012). “La percepción de la nota roja periodística en primera plana, un estudio de caso”. Revista de Comunicación. 14, 1-13
Fuente, A., Herrero, J. y Gracia, E. (2010). “Internet y apo-yo social: sociabilidad online y ajuste psicosocial en la sociedad de la información”. Acción Psicológica. 7, 9-15
García, C. (2011). “Estructura de las actitudes hacia el co-mercio electrónico”. Contribuciones a la Economía, 14, 1-10
García, C. (2012). “Estructura híbrida de los determinantes sociodemográficos del consumo electrónico”. Gepu, 3, 43-53
García, C. (2013). “Confiabilidad y validez de un instru-mento de medición de búsqueda en Internet”. Antioquia, 5, (1) 27-34
García, L., Orellana, O., Pomalaya, R., Yanac, E., Orellana, D., Sotelo, L., Herrera, E., Sotelo, N., Chavez, H. y Fer-nandi, P. (2011). “Intimidación entre iguales (Bullying): empatía e inadaptación social en participantes de Bullying”. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 14, 271-276
Garis, A. (2010). “Lógica temporal en verificación de mo-delos de software. Origen y evolución hasta tiempos ac-tuales”. Fundamentos en Humanidades, 11 (21),151-162
Gómez, A. (2013). “Bullying el poder de la violencia. Una perspectiva cualitativa sobre acosadores y víctimas en escuelas primarias de Colima”. Revista Mexicana de In-vestigación Educativa, 18, 839-870
Groshek, J. (2011). “Media, instability, a democracy: exam-ining the granger causal relationships of the 122 countries from 1943-2003”. Journal of Communication. 61, 1161-1182
Gu, M. y Goldfarb, B. (2010). “Affect and the framing ef-fect witting individuals over time: risk taking in a dynam-ic investment simulation”. Academic of Management Journal. 53, 411-431
Hallak, R., Brown, G. y Lindsay, N. (2012). “The place identity performance relationships among tourism entre-preneurs: a structural equation modeling analysis”. Tourism Management, 33, 143-154
Hazlina, N., Mohd, A. y Rohaida, S. (2012). “Nurturing intrapreneurship to enhance job performance: the role of pro-intrapreneurship organizational architecture”. Journal of Innovation Management in Small & Medium Entre-prises, , 9, 1-9
Hee, D. y Mc Daniel, S. (2011). “Using an extended Tech-nology Acceptance Model in exploring antecedents to adopting fantasy sports league websites”. International Journal of Sport Marketing & Sponsorships. 17, 240-253 Hsuan, Y., Hsu, C., Shan, R. y Ming, C. (2013). “The ef-fects of website trust, perceived ease of use, and per-ceived usefulness on consumer on line booking intention: Evidence from Taiwan B2B sector”. Life Science Journal, 10, 1516-1523
Humanes, M. y Moreno, M. (2012). “El efecto agenda sobre los temas de campaña en las elecciones generales de 2008”. Revista de Estrategia, Tendencia e Innovación de la Comunicación. 3, 191-207
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (2010). XIII Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. México: INEGI
Izquierdo, L. (2012). “La uniformidad temática en las sec-ciones de internacional de los diarios madrileños frente a las secciones locales”. Communication Papers, media Literacy & Gender Studies. 1, 97-104
Jalal, A., Marzooj, J. y Nabi, H. (2011). “Evaluating the impacts of online banking factors of motivating the pro-cess of e-banking”. Journal of Management of a Sustain-ability, 1, 32-42
Jyoti, J. y Jyoti S. (2011). “Factors affecting orientation and satisfaction of women entrepreneurs in rural India”. Annals of Innovation Entrepreneurships, 2, 1-8
Kabeer, A. y Muhammad, A. (2013). “Factors affecting adopting in mobile banking in Paquistan: Empirical evi-dence”. International Journal and Research in Business and Social Science, 3, 54-61
Kotaman, H. (2010). “Turkish early childhood educators sense of teacher efficacy”. Education & Psychology, 8, 603-516
Kupczynski, L., Mundi, M. y Green, M. (2013). “The prevalence of cyberbullying among etnhicgroups of high school students”. International Journal Educational Re-search, 1, 48-53
León, B., Castaño, E., Fajardo, F. y Gómez, T. (2012). “Cyberbullying en una muestra de estudiantes de educa-ción secundaria: variables moduladoras y redes sociales”. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10, 771-778
Long, H. (2013). “The relationships among learning orien-tation, market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance”. Management Review, 20, 37-46
López, L. y López, J. (2011). “Los modelos de adopción de tecnologías de información desde el paradigma actitu-dinal”. Cuadernos Ebape. 9, 176-196
Mao, Y., Richter, M., Burns, K. y Chaw, J. (2012). “Homelessness coverage, social reality, and media own-erships: comparing a national newspapers with to regional newspapers in Canada”. Mass Communication & Jour-nalism. 2, 1-7
Mehra, V. y Omidian, F. (2010). “Predicting factors affect-ing university student's attitudes to adopt e-learning in using Technology Acceptance Model”. International Journal of New Trends in Education of Their Implica-tions, 1, 33-43
Mendoza, B. (2011). “Bullying entre pares y el escala-miento de agresión en la relación profesor alumno”. Psi-cología Iberoamericana, 19, 58-71
Mutengezanwa, M. y Fungai, M. (2013). “Socio-demographic factors influencing adoption of Internet banking in Zinbabwe”. Journal of Sustainable Develop-ment in Africa, 15, 132-141
Nisbet, E., Stoycheff, E. y Pearce, K. (2012). “Internet use and democratic demand: a multinational, multinivel model of Internet use and citizen attitudes about democ-racy”. Journal of Communication. 62, 249-265
Orantes, S. (2011). “Viabilidad del Modelo de la Acepta-ción de la Tecnología en las empresas mexicanas. Una aproximación a las actitudes y percepciones de los usua-rios de las tecnologías de la información”. Revista Digi-tal Universitaria. 12, 1-15
Pepper, W., Aiken, M. y Garner, B. (2011). “Usefulness and usability of a multilingual meeting system”. Globar Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 11, 34-39
Ramayah, T. y Ignatius, J. (2010). “Intention to shop on line: The mediating role of perceived ease of use”. Mid-dle East Journal of Scientific Research, 5, 152-156
Ramírez, P., Rondán, F. y Arenas, J. (2010). “Influencia del género en la percepción y adopción de e-learning: Estu-dio exploratorio en una universidad chilena”. Journal of Technology, Management of Innovation. 5, 129-141
Rante, Y. y Warokka, A. (2013). “The interrelative nexus of indigenous economic growth and small business de-velopment: do local culture, government role, and entre-preneurial behavior play the role?” Journal of Innovation Management in Small & Medium Enterprises. 19, 1-19
Rojas, R., García, V. y García, E. (2011). “The influence on corporate entrepreneurship of technological varia-bles”. Industrial management & Data System, 111, 984-1005
Rojas, R., García, V., Ramírez, A. (2012). “How can we increase Spanish technology firm”. Journal of Knowledge Management. 15, 759-778
Ruíz, C., Sanz, S. y Tavera, J. (2010). “Análisis de los fac-tores determinantes del uso de mensajes SMS para parti-cipar en programas de televisión”. Cuadernos de Gestión, 10, 117-132
Sago, B. (2013). “Factors influencing social media adop-tion and frequency of use: And examination of Facebook, Twitter, Pirenterest and Google+”. International Journal of Business and Commerce. 3, 1-14
San Martin, S. y López, B. (2010). “Posibilidades de la compra venta B2C por teléfono móvil en comparación con Internet”. Cuadernos de Gestión, 10, 17-34
Sandoval, R. y Saucedo, N. (2010). “Grupos de interés en las redes sociales: el caso de Hi5 y Facebook en México·. Educación y Humanidades. 4, 132-142
Shaheen, Y. (2010). “The perceived usefulness of infor-mation for investment desicions: Evidence from Pales-tine securities exchange”. Hebron University Research Journal, 5, 283-307
Sharma, R. y Abrol, S. (2011). “Concentration of on line Banking”. International Research & Education Consorti-um, 1, 22-35
Shrrof, R., Denenn, C. y Ng, E. (2011). “Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in examining student's behavioral intention to use an e-portfolio system”. Aus-tralasian Journal of Educational Technology. 27, 600-618
Simsek, A. (2011). “The relationships between computer anxiety and computer self efficacy”. Contemporary Edu-cational Technology. 2, 177-187
Summer, L. (2011). “The Theory of Planned Behavior and the impact of past behavior”. International Business & Economics Research Journal. 10, 91-110
Teh, P., Chong, C., Yong, C. y Yew, S. (2010). “Internet self–efficacy, computer self–efficacy, and cultural factor on knowledge sharing behavior”. African Journal of Business Management. 4, 4086-4095
Tekeher, S. (2013). “Mathematics teacher educator's and pre service teacher's beliefs about the use of technology in teaching in African university”. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 12, 9-20
Thiruchelvi, A. y Koteeswari, S. (2013). “A conceptual framework of employees' continuance intention to use of e-learning system”. Asian Journal of Research in Busi-ness Economic and Management, 1, 3-6
Torres, C., Robles, J. y Molina, O. (2011). “¿Por qué usamos las tecnologías de la información y comunicaciones? Un estudio sobre las bases sociales de la utilidad indivi-dual de Internet”. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69, 371-392
Wang, D. y Huynh, Q. (2013). “An assessment of the role of the perceived usefulness in the adoption of manage-ment accounting practices”. African Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 85-96
Wiedmann, K., Hennings, N., Varelmann, D. y Reeh, M. (2010). “Determinants of consumers perceived trust in IT
-ecosystems”. Journal of Theoretical Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 5, 137-154
Wirth, W., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Friemel, T., Hânggli, R. y Siegert, G. (2010). “Agenda building and setting in referendum campaign: investigat-ing the flow of arguments among campaigners, the me-dia, and the public”. Journalism & Mass Media Commu-nication. 87, 328-345
Yuangion, Y. (2011). “The impact of strong ties on entre-preneurial intention. An empirical study based on the mediating role of self-efficacy”. Journal Entrepreneur-ship, 3, 147-158
Zaidel, M. y Zhu, D. (2010). “Utilization of technical sup-port by instructorp in comuter supporter learning”. Inter-national Journal of Arts and Sciences, 14, 12-19
Zamiri, M., Mahamed, S. y Baqutayan, S. (2012). “Exploring factor that influence knowledge shaing be-havior via computer”. Journal of Emerging Trends inc Computing and Information Science, 3, 799-805
Zampetakis, L. y Moustakis, V. (2013). “Entrepreneurial behavior in the Grekk public sector”. Emerald, 13, 1-7
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
No
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lirios Cruz (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Statement as defined by DOAJ
“Open Access” is a general term encompassing both Free and Open Access. For DOAJ, open access is only when digital content is freely available online and user rights and copyright terms are clearly defined.
All texts published by Tlamati—without exception—are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Science and Philosophy ISSN: 2594-2204 (for example, including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided they clearly indicate that the work was first published in Tlamati.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license.
You are free to:
Share
Read
Download
Translate
Copy
Distribute
Print
Search or link to the full text of the articles
Crawl them for indexing
Pass them as data into software or
Use them for any other lawful purpose, in any medium or format
License terms: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.es
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
